Exmoor Mires peatland restoration, UK

Year of issue
2025
Summary

The Exmoor Mires project is part of a wider Upstream Thinking programme initiated by the local water company South West Water (SWW) to use land management to tackle problems of water quality and quantity across South-west England. The benefit to SWW is in potentially reducing the costs of water treatment. Demonstration of success will allow SWW to approach the regulator (OFWAT) for permission to develop PES schemes to deliver these benefits in future. The Exmoor Mires project involves peatland restoration through blocking historic drainage ditches with a target of restoring 2000 ha by 2015. The primary benefits of the project have been to reduce runoff (32%) and increase water storage (additional 364 m3/ha). The success of the project has been aided by the land ownership and public engagement by the Exmoor National Park Authority and support from other public agencies and research from universities.

Photo Gallery
Location
51.129, -3.757
Project
NWRM
National ID
UK_04
Sector
Hydromorphology
Installation Date
2006-ongoing
Implementation status
Ongoing
Contact
Alistair McVittie, SRUC

Overview

Location of the project
The Exmoor Mires project is located in Exmoor National Park, Somerset, mainly on upland blanket bogs near Simonsbath, Wheddon Cross, and Exe Head. Key restoration sites include Hoar Oak, Chains Barrow, Blackpitts, and Furzehill Common. Areas are near minor roads like B3223 and B3358 but are largely remote moorlands in river headwaters.
Country
United Kingdom
NUTS2 Code
Dorset and Somerset
Sponge measures implemented in the case study
Wetland restoration and management
Objectives
Restore 2,500 hectares of peatland by 2020.
Achieve a 30% reduction in peak flow rates in restored areas.
Increase water retention capacity by 20% in targeted sites.
Involved partners
Authority type Authority name Authority role Comments Authority responsibility
Regional / sub-national water authority South West Water Financing SWW is a private sector water company covering the South West of England. Its role has been to finance the project. Responsible
Nature park Exmoor National Park Authority Implementation ENPA is a land owner within the National Park including project sites. ENPA is responsible for delivery of the project with funding from SWW Responsible
National water authority Natural England Determination of design details of the measure NE is the national agency responsible for agri-environment funding and advice. Their role in this project is to fund captial works through agri-environment scheme measures —
Other English Heritage Determination of design details of the measure EH will provide advice on matters relating to the historic environment and provide project steering Supporting
National water authority Environment Agency Monitoring The EA will provide hydrological data and analysis and has a role project steering Supporting
Research institute / University University of Exeter Monitoring UoE is providing research and monitoring of hydrological and GHG impacts together with UoB and EA Supporting
Research institute / University University of Bristol Monitoring UoB is providing research and monitoring of hydrological and GHG impacts together with UoE and EA Supporting

Site Information

Climate Zone
Cool temperate moist
Precipitation
1581.00 mm
Temperature (°C)
8.00 °C
Runoff
1327.00 mm
Runoff coefficient
0.84
Elevation range
420 m
Vegetation class
The area is characterized by blanket bog vegetation, including species such as Sphagnum mosses and cotton grass, indicative of wetter conditions.
WFD Ecological status
Good
WFD Chemical status
Good
Water quality status
Prior to restoration, the peatlands were degraded due to historical drainage, leading to increased runoff and potential water quality issues.

Design and Implementation

Project scale
Meso
Project scale specifications
Work spans multiple Exmoor headwaters (e.g., Exe headwaters/The Chains), with ~3,000 ha restored by 2020 and ongoing regional programme (SWPP) across several moors
Project area
> 2,000
Basis of design
The restoration measures are designed to handle typical rainfall events in the region, aiming to restore natural hydrological regimes rather than targeting specific storm events.
Principles
The project is grounded in principles of ecosystem restoration, aiming to re-establish natural hydrological functions, enhance biodiversity, and contribute to climate change mitigation through carbon sequestration.
Constraints
Challenges include the site's steep slopes and thin peat layers, which require careful planning and adaptation of restoration techniques to ensure effectiveness and prevent further degradation.
Favourable preconditions
The project has involvement from a number of key stakeholder groups including South West Water (as part of its Upstream Thinking Programme), academic researchers, land owners (Exmoor National Park Authority). There has also been a history of re-wetting projects in the the surrounding area.

Financing

Total cost
12185302.50 €
Total cost information
2006–2010 (EMRP): precursor phase reviewed; Ofwat (PR09) allowed SWW to spend up to £3.8m on Dartmoor & Exmoor catchment management (not Exmoor-only).
2010–2015 (Mires on the Moors): SWW £2.2m committed.
2010–2020 (Exmoor Mires Partnership): ~£4.5m to restore ~3,000 ha; funders: SWW, Environment Agency, Natural England. Public sources do not break down shares beyond this.
2021–2025 (SW Peatland Partnership covering Exmoor, Dartmoor, Bodmin, West Penwith): £13m programme incl. £9m from Natural England’s Nature for Climate Peatland Grant Scheme plus match from SWW, Duchy of Cornwall, National Trust, Cornwall Council. (Regional, not Exmoor-only; no Exmoor split published.)
Costs investment information
The land is under Higher Level Stewardship scheme and would be eligible for measures including "Maintenance of Moorland†Ÿ (HL9) or "Restoration of Moorland†Ÿ (HL10) at £40/ha (€47.2/ha at £1 = €1.18) plus a £10/ha (€11.8/ha) supplement for "Moorland re-wetting†Ÿ (HL13). This would either be paid under the HLS agreement or by the project (i.e. no cost to the land owner)
Costs land acquisition information
Land is owned by the Exmoor National Park and tenanted for farming
Financing authorities
Authority name Type of funding Comments
European Union EU-funds: Rural development funds The capital costs of the measures themselves are funded through agri-environment payments.
SWW Private funds —

Policy and Governance

Policy description
The Exmoor Mires Restoration Project addresses the degradation of peatlands due to historical drainage and land-use changes. This degradation leads to increased runoff, reduced water quality, and loss of biodiversity. Digging of drainage ditches over decades has resulted in drying out of blanket peat bog, re-wetting is being undertaken through blocking drains to increase retention of water and carbon.
Land ownership
Exmoor National Park Authority owns much of the restoration land; areas are tenanted for farming. Work also involves other local landowners/commoners.
Policy targets
Runoff control
Increase Water Storage
Pollutants Removal
Oher Societal Benefits
Target remarks
The project's design focuses on re-wetting drained peatlands to restore their natural hydrology, which helps in controlling runoff and peak flows. This restoration enhances water storage capacity and supports diverse habitats, contributing to biodiversity. Secondary benefits include improved groundwater recharge, reduction in pollutant loads, and erosion control. Additionally, the project offers societal benefits like carbon sequestration and recreational opportunities.
Policy pressure
Directive Relevant pressure
WFD identified pressure Good ecological and chemical status of water bodies.
WFD identified pressure Good ecological and chemical status of water bodies.
Pressure remarks
The project aligns with multiple EU directives, addressing pressures related to water quality, flood risk, and habitat conservation. Restoration efforts contribute to meeting the objectives set by these policies.
Policy impact
Directive Relevant impact
WFD identified pressure Improved water quality and ecological status of water bodies.
Floods Directive identified pressure Enhanced flood risk management through natural retention.
Other EU Habitats Directive : Restoration of priority habitats leading to increased biodiversity.
Part of a wider plan
Oui
Wider plan
Wider plan type Wider plan focus Name Comments
Regional Water Upstream Thinking Upstream Thinking is an initiative run by South West Water in South West England that aims to improve water quality and quanitity through improved land management in upper catchments. The benefit to SWW is in potentially reducing the costs of water treatment. Demonstration of success will allow SWW to approach the regulator (OFWAT) for permission to develop PES schemes to deliver these benefits in future.
Regional Environment & Biodiversity South West Peatland Partnership (SWPP) A regional initiative coordinating peatland restoration efforts across South West England.
National Environment & Biodiversity National Peatland Strategy Focuses on the protection and restoration of peatlands for climate regulation, water management, and biodiversity in the UK.
Local — Exmoor National Park Management Plan Local plan emphasizing the conservation of natural resources, including peatlands, within the park.
Public consultation
Oui
Consultation activities
Activity stage Activity type Comments
Implementation phase Project website http://upstreamthinking.org/index.cfm?articleid=8699 (no longer available)
Implementation phase Online, classroom and outdoor educational materials and activities http://www.exmoormires.org.uk/index.cfm?articleid=9633 (no longer available)
Implementation phase Outdoor events and activities http://www.exmoormires.org.uk/index.cfm?articleid=11396 (no longer available)
Implementation phase Volunteering opportunities http://www.exmoormires.org.uk/index.cfm?articleid=10819 (no longer available)
Has contractual arrangements
Oui
Contractual arrangements
Arrangement type Name
Contractual agreement Memorandum of agreement concerning the Exmoor Mires Project

Impacts and Monitoring

Monitoring System

Monitoring parameters
Measurements of discharge, water table levels, dissolved organic carbon (DOC), water color, and pH.

Impact Assessment Methodology

Performance impact assessment method
Catchment outlet
Performance impact estimation information
Water quantity:
In-situ depth to water table measurements at > 200 locations across 8 "experimental pools" and within 3 headwater catchments.
Discharge quantified for 7 drainage features and at 3 catchment outlets.
Meteorological variables are recorded at each catchment.
Water quality:
Storm-flow sampling using ISCO pump sampler
DOC measurements (UV spectrophotometer)
Colour: UV - vis Spectrometer (Abs 400nm; Fulvic/Humic ratio (E4/E6))
pH
Biophysical impact assessment method
Assessed through hydrological monitoring (e.g., water table measurements, discharge) and water quality analyses (e.g., DOC, pH).

Socio-economic Impacts

Direct benefits information
South West Water report that reduced silt level in water could reduce treatment costs for drinking water by 20%.
Research is ongoing with respect to agricultural impacts. These include sward quality for grazing (potential for higher and more uniform water table to improve dry matter and digestability, metabolisable energy and crude protein levels) and levels of parasites (reduction in tick numbers at one restored site; reduced habitat suitability for the snail host of liver fluke). Impacts of re-wetting on cattle movements are to be studied

Biophysical impacts: Hydrology

Hydrological effects
The project has restored the natural hydrology of degraded blanket bogs by blocking drainage ditches, leading to increased water retention and a rise in water table levels. This has resulted in enhanced water storage and a more stable hydrological regime.
Information on retained water
By blocking over 100 km of ditches with more than 10,000 dams, the project has re-saturated the bogs, allowing them to hold more water and release it more slowly. This has improved the bogs' capacity to retain water, acting as natural reservoirs.
Increased water storage
364.00
Increased water storage unit
m3/ha
Information on increased water storage
Based on 260,000 cubic meters of additional water storage in peat over the first restored area of 714 ha.
Peak flow reduction
32.00
Peak flow reduction unit
% Percent
Information on peak flow reduction
Storm flow production is reduced to approximately 32% of its pre-restoration level, following catchment restoration
Reduced depth to groundwater
0.02 m
Information on reduced depth to groundwater
Average decrease in depth to groundwater (during non rainfall-runoff event periods) with a range of 0.0103 to 0.0265 m
Reducing flood risks quantity
The re-wetted peatlands act as natural sponges, absorbing excess rainfall and reducing the risk of downstream flooding.

Biophysical impacts: Biodiversity

Improved biodiversity
Oui
Information on improved biodiversity
The project has improved habitats for various species, including sphagnum mosses, which are crucial for peat formation. The wetter conditions have also benefited wetland flora and fauna, enhancing overall biodiversity in the area.

Biophysical impacts: Water & Soil Quality

Information on water quality overall
Carbon/DOC: total carbon yield reductions up to ~50% reported; DOC/colour issues targeted as a utility driver.
Soil quality overall improvements
N/A info
Ecosystem erosion control
Non

Biophysical impacts: Others

Ecosystem impact climate regulation
Impact on GHGs (net emissions and storage) including soil carbon
Information on ecosystem impact GHG soil carbon
Restored peatlands sequester carbon, reducing net greenhouse gas emissions. The project helps in maintaining and enhancing soil carbon stocks.

Lessons Learned

Key lessons
This is an ongoing project of moorland rewetting involving blocking of existing drainage ditches, as such monitoring of impacts on water quality, water flow, habitats and greenhouse gases has not been completed. However, preliminary results for water quality and quantity are encouraging with storm water run-off reduced by 32% and the average depth to the water table level reduced. The project is a continuation of an exiting partnership between the regional water company (South West Water), the Exmoor National Park Authority (also the landowner) and national agencies (Natural England, Environment Agency, English Heritage). There is also academic input (Universities of Exeter and Bristol) into monitoring of inputs.
Barriers
Barrier type Barrier role Comments
Legal obligations / restrictions Main barrier SWW is subject to regulatory constraint (OFWAT) regarding investments such as NWRM. The benefits need to be demonstrated to secure regulatory authorisation to continue restoration work and develop PES schemes
Drivers
Driver type Driver role Comments
Organisation committed to it Main driver National and regional commitments to climate change mitigation and habitat restoration. The degraded peatlands contributing to carbon emissions and biodiversity loss.
Success factors
Success factor type Success factor role Comments
Successful coordination between authorities Main factor The Exmoor Mires project follows on from previous rewetting of 313ha of moorland on Exmoor by a partnership of the same stakeholders between 2006 and 2010 - 'Exmoor Mire Restoration Project'
Transferability
The project's methodologies are transferable to other degraded peatlands, provided there's stakeholder buy-in and appropriate funding. Key considerations include understanding local hydrology, land-use history, and socio-economic contexts. Flexibility in approach and continuous monitoring are essential for success elsewhere.
Basin characteristics influence
The site's steep slopes and thin peat layers necessitated tailored restoration techniques, such as using locally sourced materials for dam construction.

Sources