Ecological Restoration of Pochina Lake, Romania

Year of issue
2025
Summary

The project’s objective was to improve the conservation status of aquatic bird species in Lower Prut Floodplain Natural Park (Galați County, RO) through scientific inventory, monitoring, site restoration, awareness-raising, implementation of the park management plan, and the designation of Natura 2000 SPAs. Partners were the University of Bucharest, the Romanian Ornithological Society and Romsilva – Galați Forestry.

At Pochina, two Prut–lake channels were cleaned and re-profiled (supply L = 362 m; evacuation L = 235 m), with small dykes/footbridges to maintain levels and enable gravitational flushing of sediments; a birdwatching tower was installed. Pochina is a national natural reserve (RONPA0432, 74.8 ha) located near Rogojeni (Suceveni Commune) and lies within the park’s Natura 2000 framework.

Photo Gallery
Location
45.991667, 28.096111
Project
NWRM
National ID
Romania_ 07
Sector
Hydromorphology
Installation Date
2010-10
Implementation status
Completed
Contact
Barbu Constantin, RECImola Koszta, REC

Overview

Location of the project
In Rogojeni village (Suceveni commune); access on DJ242D Suceveni–Rogojeni; the park boundary intersects DN26 near Rogojeni.
Country
Romania
NUTS2 Code
Sud-Est
Sponge measures implemented in the case study
Floodplain restoration and management
Lake restoration
Objectives
Improve the conservation status of 13 priority and 50+ other Birds Directive species present in the Lower Prut Floodplain Natural Park.
Re-establish the ecological balance of lakes by fixing degraded hydrological structures and improving/maintaining water levels.
Designate four SPAs (Romanian Natura 2000) and prepare/approve an integrated park management plan and administration.
Carry out inventories and monitoring, plus public engagement (village consultations, picture books, nature trails, six annual environment days, bird-watching towers).
Clean and re-profile two Prut–lake channels: supply 362 m, evacuation 235 m; build small dykes/footbridges to maintain levels and allow gravitational flushing.
Involved partners
Authority type Authority name Authority role Comments
Other County Council Galati Financing County Council
Other University of Bucharest, Research Center for Environment and Impact Studies — Research and development ceter for the environment
NGO Romanian Ornithological Society Monitoring —
Forest owners Forestry Department Galati — —
NGO Park Administration Lower Prut Floodplain — —
Other The administrative circumscription of Suceveni Commune, Rogojeni Village Other —

Site Information

Climate Zone
Cool temperate dry
Precipitation
500.00 mm
Temperature (°C)
11.00 °C
Elevation range
2
Groundwater level
~9–32 m depth; flow toward the Lower Prut floodplain
Vegetation class
Aquatic & palustrine vegetation.
WFD Ecological status
Moderate
WFD Chemical status
Good
Water quality status
Organic loading and high mineralization; risks from agricultural pesticides and transboundary accidental discharges

Design and Implementation

Project scale
Micro
Project scale specifications
Site-level hydromorphology within a meso-scale park project.
Project area
74,8
Area subject to Land use change or Management/Practice change (ha)
41.80 ha
Favourable preconditions
Wetlands belong to the category of ecologically fragile areas, their dynamic being influenced mainly by the qualitative and quantitative characteristic of the water in the hydrographical basin in which they extend. For this reason, the conservation measures promoted in these spaces must be doubled by a strict control of the anthropic activities / arrangements using water for different purposes or as a medium of discharging some wastes.

Financing

Total cost
824710.00 €
Financing authorities
Authority name Type of funding Comments Financing share
European Union EU-funds: LIFE+ 412,355 € 50 %
The Ministry of Environment and the Sustainable Development National funds 412,355 € with all non-EU sources 50 %
Galati County Council Local funds 412,355 € with all non-EU sources 50%
Compensations
No

Policy and Governance

Policy description
The ecological reconstruction works carried out within the project ensure, by gravitational transfer, a water volume, enough to contribute to the conservation of this special conservation area, declared SPA.
Also, this water transfer from the Prut into Pochina Lake will allow for the cleaning of the bottom of the lake in the future, together with the excess of water being evacuated the extra alluvial deposits, too.
With a view to maintain the water level, dykes were built on the channels as well as footbridges for the free circulation.
Land ownership
State public domain (lake basin).
Policy targets
Increase Water Storage
Improved Biodiversity
Groundwater Recharge
Part of a wider plan
Yes
Wider plan
Wider plan type Wider plan focus Name
National Environment & Biodiversity Lower Danube Green Corridor programme
Public consultation
Yes
Consultation activities
Activity stage Activity type Key issues
Implementation phase Awareness raising activities These include information dissemination, consultation of every village in the area, and active participation and education with local educational material to be produced. The project takes into account that there is a relatively high illiteracy in the area and will address stakeholders in wide variety of ways, including picture books, nature trails, six annual environment days with expeditions into the area, children's exhibitions, and bird watching towers
Has contractual arrangements
No

Impacts and Monitoring

Monitoring System

Monitoring requirements
Monitoring is carried out under the park management plan, with Romanian Ornithological Society (SOR) listed as a monitoring actor for Pochina and LIFE requiring continued checks of birds and water quality/quantity.
Monitoring parameters
As in the project framework, the site tracks bird population status and organochlorine pesticide bioaccumulation in birds, alongside water quality and quantity.

Maintenance

Maintenance requirements
The two Prut–Pochina channels are kept functional with dykes/footbridges to hold levels, and gravitational flushing is used to clear sediments after the initial dredging and re-profiling done in 2009.

Socio-economic Impacts

Direct benefits information
Better conditions for the birds population; increasing the number for aquatic bird species (especially those listed in Annex I of Birds Directive, Bern Convention and in ORNIS lists); improve the trophic state and saprobity of the target aquatic systems; allowing the water oxygenation of the lakes through the input of the fresh water from the Prut River; including the monitoring birds protocols in the adaptive Management Plan of Lower Prut Floodplain Natural Park;
Channel works and a bird tower underpin eco-tourism/education and fisheries potential.
Ancillary benefits information
Supply the potential of fisheries resources; using the potential of providing services for tourism and recreation;

Biophysical impacts: Hydrology

Hydrological effects
Increased water storage and maintained levels

Biophysical impacts: Biodiversity

Improved biodiversity
Yes
Information on improved biodiversity
Restoration of aquatic birds sites in the natural protected area located in Lower Prut Floodplain Natural Patk - Pochina Lake

Biophysical impacts: Water & Soil Quality

Water quality overall improvements
Positive impact-WQ improvement
Information on water quality overall
Improved trophic state and saprobity and oxygenation of the lakes by fresh Prut inflows.
Sediment removal/dredging was undertaken at the inlet.

Lessons Learned

Key lessons
The works at works of Pochina Lake assures, by gravitational transfer a sufficient water volum to contribute to the conservation of this special area, designated Special Protected Area (SPA).
A gravity-based reconnection (cleaning/re-profiling two Prut–lake channels) reliably secures sufficient water volume for SPA conservation and helps flush alluvial deposits; holding works (dykes/footbridges) keep levels steady while allowing circulation.
Barriers
Barrier type Barrier role Comments
Lacking financing sources Main barrier Park-level under-funded maintenance and siltation, reducing fish-farming usability by ~70% (a long-term operational constraint for hydraulic assets in the complex).
Expected maintenance needs Secondary barrier Persistent alluvial/sediment inputs requiring dredging and inlet enlargement.
Legal obligations / restrictions Secondary barrier Communication constraints in parts of the park (high illiteracy addressed by the LIFE outreach package).
Drivers
Driver type Driver role
Organisation committed to it Main driver
Success factors
Success factor type Success factor role Comments
Attitude of decision makers Main factor —
Financing possibilities Main factor Financing mix: EU LIFE+, national, county.
Communication activities Secondary factor Extensive stakeholder outreach and education during implementation.
Transferability
Highly transferable to low-gradient river–floodplain lakes: modest channel dredging plus small sluices and dyke repairs can restore levels and habitat. Success hinges on sediment load and long-term maintenance, available inflows, protected-area rules and stakeholder alignment. Watch for rapid re-siltation, drought-driven low flows and fish-farm constraints; embed monitoring of birds and water quality.

Sources