WETMAN - Conservation and management of freshwater, Slovenia

Summary

Summary

The LIFE WETMAN project (2011–2015) restored six Slovenian wetlands (Pohorje bogs, Zelenci, Mura–Petišovci oxbows, Gornji kal, Planik and Vrhe). It improved hydrological conditions (e.g., dams on outflows in the Pohorje bogs and a gravel/sediment trap on the Čošelnov graben feeding Zelenci), removed overgrowth, and eliminated invasive fish in Gornji kal and the Mura oxbows. To reduce habitat damage and disturbance, footpaths/boardwalks were created in Zelenci and on the Pohorje bogs. Site-specific management guidelines were prepared and integrated into sectoral and Natura 2000 planning to ensure long-term conservation.

After LIFE, implementation continued: a Zelenci management plan was prepared in 2013 with the municipality; the national Natura 2000 Management Programme (2015–2020) and the integrated project LIFE-IP NATURA.SI (2018–2026) have supported further measures and monitoring. On Pohorje, follow-up regional projects (SUPORT and POHORKA, 2019–2023) consolidated habitat and visitor-management actions. WETMAN’s results were also recognised with a Best LIFE Nature award at EU Green Week.

Photo gallery

Overview
Year of issue
2025
Project
NWRM
Implementation status
Completed
Contact
REC
Location of the project
Multi-site LIFE WETMAN actions across Slovenia :
Zelenci (Kranjska Gora): just after Podkoren, south side of main road 202, with car park on the left when driving from Kranjska Gora.
Mura oxbows near Petišovci (Lendava): on the Mura floodplain by Petišovci settlement at the Slovenia–Croatia border; works at Nagy Parlag, Muriša, Csiko Legelo.
Gornji kal (Bela krajina): between Hrast pri Vinici and Perudina, three karst ponds (Gornji kal, Krivače, Kršeljivec).
Sponge measures implemented in the case study
Wetland restoration and management
Lake restoration
Appropriate design of roads and stream crossings
Objectives
Restore hydrology of peatlands/mires and oxbows
Reduce overgrowth on priority wetland habitats at Zelenci, Vrhe, Planik and selected Mura oxbows/Gornji kal sites.
Remove invasive fish: eradicate Silurus glanis from Hrast pond (Gornji kal) to re-establish 1.2 ha of suitable pond-turtle habitat; remove Ctenopharyngodon idella, Micropterus salmoides, Pseudorasbora parva from three Mura oxbows to re-establish 2.7 ha of habitat for target taxa (Umbra, Emys, Bombina, Triturus, Leucorrhinia pectoralis).
Limit habitat destruction/disturbance by building boardwalks/footpaths in Zelenci and on Pohorje and by organising visitor management/monitoring.
Embed conservation in planning: prepare site management guidelines and integrate them into sectoral/Natura 2000 plans (covering 4,439 ha across 6 SCIs and 2 SPAs).
Involved partners
Authority typeAuthority nameAuthority role
National water authorityInstitute of the Republic of Slovenia for Nature conservation—
—Fisheries Research Institute of Slovenia—
Local water authorityRuše Municipality—
—Institute for Water of the Republic of Slovenia—
Forest ownersSlovenia Forest Service—
Local water authorityKranjska Gora Municipality—
—RTV Slovenia-National roadcasting company—
National water authorityMinistry of Environment and spatial planningFinancing
Local water authorityMinistries of each locationFinancing
Site Information
Climate Zone
Warm temperate moist
Precipitation
1065.00 mm
Temperature (°C)
10.20 °C
Elevation range
765 m
Vegetation class
Bogs and fens (peatland communities) across pilot areas: active/transition mires on Pohorje and Zelenci, and alkaline fens / wet meadows at Vrhe/Planik; aquatic/riparian vegetation around Mura oxbows and karst ponds at Gornji kal. If a single class is required: “bog & fen communities (peatlands).”
WFD Ecological status
Unknown
WFD Chemical status
Unknown
Water quality status
eutrophication (agriculture), invasive fish introductions, waste dumping
Design and Implementation
Project scale
Micro
Project scale specifications
A network of six discrete pilot sites across Slovenia where site-specific actions (small hydromorphological works, invasive-fish removal, visitor-management boardwalks) were implemented to restore local wetland habitats; the project does not operate at river-basin or national planning scale.
Financing
Total cost
2144376.00 €
Total cost information
LIFE09 NAT/SI/000374 WETMAN (2011-2015)
Costs capital
2144376.00 €
Financing authorities
Authority nameType of fundingCommentsFinancing share
European UnionEU-funds: LIFE+€1,072,18850 %
Ministry of Environment & Spatial PlanningNational funds€563,09525 %
MunicipalitiesLocal fundsČrnomelj €12,000; Maribor €4,000; Zreče €4,000; Slovenjska Bistrica €3,000; Slovenj Gradec €2,500; Lovrenc na Pohorju €2,000.—
Compensations
No
Policy and Governance
Policy description
Slovenian wetlands had been degraded by drainage and hydro-amelioration, canalisation of rivers, and the loss of appropriate management; this drove peatland drying and overgrowth. Tourism/visitor pressure damaged sensitive habitats, and invasive fish introductions altered oxbow and pond biocenoses; around some oxbows, intensive agriculture reached the water’s edge. Mapped to WFD: hydromorphological alteration (drainage, channelisation), biological pressure: invasive alien species, and diffuse agricultural pressure (nutrients/eutrophication risk) where farming abuts oxbows.
Land ownership
Mixed ownership across sites: state, municipal and private land. During permitting the team obtained 41 landowner consents and permissions from the Farmland & Forest Fund of the Republic of Slovenia (state land manager) and municipalities.
Policy targets
Improved Biodiversity
Increase Water Storage
Part of a wider plan
No
Public consultation
No
Consultation activities
Activity stageActivity typeComments
Implementation phaseFormal engagement included 91 meetings with municipalities, 44 with ministries/ARSO, 17 with the Agricultural & Forestry Chamber, 36 with farmers/hunters/fishers, plus one workshop with the police.Improving local capacity for sustainable land and visitor management.
Implementation phase56 public events, 45 school/youth events (reaching 2,293 children and youth), 13 photo exhibitions; a TV documentary and 3 TV spots by RTV Slovenia.For the general public and schools
Has contractual arrangements
No
Impacts and Monitoring

Monitoring System

Monitoring requirements
ZRSVN coordinates ongoing monitoring of hydrology (piezometers/outflow), water quality at Zelenci, visitor pressure on Pohorje, and target taxa (amphibians, birds, Emys, Odonata, habitats), via contracted specialists and integration with national schemes.
Monitoring parameters
Hydrology: groundwater water-table levels (piezometers), outflow from restored mires (e.g., Vrhe).
Water quality (Zelenci): physico-chemical parameters (nitrates, phosphates, chlorides) and biological indicators (algae).
Biota: amphibians, birds, European pond turtle (Emys orbicularis), dragonflies (Odonata), habitat types incl. Liparis loeselii; fish status reported for Umbra krameri in Mura oxbows.
Visitors: counts/flow used to manage trampling/pressure on Pohorje sites.

Maintenance

Maintenance requirements
Long-term maintenance is ensured by 10-year contracts (gravel-trap emptying at Zelenci, mowing at Gornji kal, site management at Vrhe/Planik) plus municipal/ARSO programmes for sediment-trap cleaning and routine path/boardwalk upkeep.

Socio-economic Impacts

Direct benefits
On Pohorje, 2,362 m of wooden footpaths and a visitor-monitoring system were installed; in 2012 the three bog sites received >55,000 visits (Lovrenška bogs >33,000/yr, 1,471 max/day). Footpaths canalised visitors and reduced trampling/disturbance on sensitive habitats.
The project generated >200 media articles and >560 events (meetings, workshops, public actions).
Construction/maintenance works on Pohorje involved >616 effective volunteer work-days (mountaineering clubs, tourist & hunting associations, municipal reps, armed forces, scouts, individuals).
In addition, outreach actions organised 19 volunteer events totalling 1,182 volunteer-days.
Zelenci Management Plan was prepared and approved by the Kranjska Gora municipal council, setting a long-term framework (to 2030) with five-year operator work plans for reserve management and visitor use.

Biophysical impacts: Hydrology

Information on retained water
Pohorje bogs: 111 wooden dykes installed on drainage/outflow channels (Javorski vrh 17; Klopnovrška 25 type-A + 64 type-B; Lovrenška 5) and 6 new waterholes (2 Javorski vrh, 4 Klopnovrška). Monitoring with 20 piezometers at two sites showed groundwater levels rose and fluctuated less after works. Hydrology improved across Klopnovrška 12.29 ha (+4.15 ha buffer = 16.44 ha), Javorski vrh 2.4 ha, Lovrenška 84 ha.
Zelenci (springs of Sava Dolinka): Built a gravel/sediment barrier 110 m long, 220 m³ capacity on Čošelnov graben; expected to prevent further gravel accumulation and hydrological change over 54.55 ha of wetland.
Vrhe: Constructed a dam and distribution channel to re-spread water across the fen; added two culverts to stop road-gravel deposition.
Gornji kal (karst ponds): Bank re-profiling and renewal of ponds (Krivače 0.4 ha; Hrast 0.7 ha; Kršeljivec 1.3 ha) improved water regime; Emys habitat improved over 18.5 ha; succession slowed.
Mura–Petišovci oxbows: Deepened Nagy Parlag (2.6 ha) and Csiko Legelo (0.8 ha) to ~2.5 m; moved ~27,000 m³ spoil to Lakoš gravel pit, creating 3.75 ha of new habitat on spoil banks; hydrology of the wider oxbow area improved over 31.3 ha.

Biophysical impacts: Biodiversity

Improved biodiversity
Yes
Information on improved biodiversity
Overgrowth removal and habitat structure restoration on Mura oxbows 3.33 ha (Nagy Parlag 2.55 ha; Csiko Legelo 0.78 ha) → biodiversity increased in final inventories.
Invasive fish control: At Hrast pond, removed 525 alien fish (92 kg) in spring 2012; regular angling removed 22 carp (200 kg) and 11 Wels catfish (146 kg); Wels density reduced significantly but not fully eradicated.
Target species habitat gains: Emys orbicularis habitat improved (1.2 ha at Hrast; site-wide 18.5 ha including banks/nesting areas); creation of shallow margins, peninsulas, islands at Krivače/Hrast; new habitat on Lakoš spoil banks (3.75 ha) for taxa incl. Leucorrhinia pectoralis, Umbra krameri, Bombina bombina, Triturus carnifex.
Pohorje bog vegetation & fauna: Raised water tables and dyke system expected to slow/stop shrub/tree encroachment; works benefited active raised bogs and transition mires and capercaillie/black grouse habitats; 2,362 m of boardwalks channelled visitors, reducing trampling; >55,000 visits counted across three bogs in 2012 (Lovrenška >33,000/yr; 1,471 max in a day).

Biophysical impacts: Water & Soil Quality

Information on water quality overall
The Zelenci barrier intercepts coarse load/sediment before it reaches the reserve (process protection stated); no numeric water-chemistry results reported in accessible WETMAN summaries.
Lessons Learned
Key lessons
Consensus-based planning pays off. The conservation guidelines and the Zelenci management plan were co-created through facilitated, bottom-up workshops, which made later implementation easier and better accepted.

Hydrological restoration needs time. Monitoring showed groundwater levels rose and became more stable on restored bogs, but the report stresses that full ecological responses to water-regime works will manifest over a longer period beyond the project end.

Managing people is as critical as managing water. Heavy visitation on Pohorje required visitor monitoring and 2,362 m of boardwalks to channel use and reduce trampling, combining infrastructure with education and outreach.

Invasive species control is rarely “one-and-done”. Intensive removal reduced alien fish (incl. Silurus glanis) but did not fully eradicate them, so ongoing fishery management and rules were built into plans.

Pragmatism with permissions and land matters helps. Where planned land purchase proved impractical, the team redesigned the Zelenci gravel-barrier solution and navigated a wide suite of permits and owner consents to keep delivery on track.
Barriers
Barrier typeBarrier roleComments
OtherSecondary barrierEcological time-lags: hydrology effects need longer to translate into full habitat/species recovery.
Expected maintenance needsSecondary barrierPartial success on alien-fish eradication, requiring continued management.
Attitude of relevant stakeholdersSecondary barrierLand and permitting complexity: mosaic ownership, many permits; planned land purchase replaced by alternative engineering.
OtherSecondary barrierAccess and logistics restrictions in forest reserves (limited mechanisation → more manual/volunteer work)
Market failuresMain barrierBudget adjustments due to unforeseen situations and extra on-site needs (still within total budget).
Success factors
Success factor typeSuccess factor roleComments
Successful coordination between authoritiesMain factorBottom-up, cross-sector process that produced conservation guidelines integrated into forestry, fishery, hunting and municipal plans.
Public participationMain factorStrong monitoring and adaptive feedback (piezometers, visitor counts) informing management
Conducted assessments (incl. economic)Secondary factorLong-term “After-LIFE” arrangements (four 10-year maintenance contracts and two 10-year bank warranties) to secure upkeep.
Communication activitiesMain factorHigh visibility and engagement (media, schools, >1,100 volunteer-days) building social licence.
Transferability
Highly transferable to small wetland restorations (bogs, fens, oxbows, ponds): simple hydrological works (wooden dams, small berms, gravel/sediment traps), invasive-fish control, and visitor management worked when paired with local plans and After-LIFE maintenance. Look carefully at land/permit complexity, upstream sediment sources, incomplete IAS eradication, hydrological time-lags, and the need for long-term monitoring.
Sources