Résumé
Due to major developments over the past two centuries, the Eau Morte Valley (a tributary of Annecy Lake) has a hydrosedimentary dysfunction with incised areas and areas with sediment excesses and an alluvial marsh disconnected from flooding. To reduce the impacts of the river's floods on uses, and to prevent the risk of urban areas flooding, a functional restoration programme for the valley has been developed by the federation of municipalities of Annecy lake sources. It was based on the renaturation of the Eau Morte bed, the functional restoration of the Giez marsh and the construction of crossing structures. This work has given the marsh a role as a flood expansion area. This project was also carried out by involving local residents in a process of territorial dialogue so that they themselves would be actors in the area and would participate in its management.
Photo gallery
Vue d'ensemble
The headwaters of the Eau Morte Basin are very productive in terms of sedimentary materials, due in particular to the presence of suspended moraines. Its valley is an alluvial plain resulting from the progressive filling of an ancient lake by the progressive addition of sediments.
Reconnect the Giez marsh with the Eau Morte floods;
Restore sediment transit in the valley;
Restore ecological continuity between a spawning area favourable for trout and Annecy Lake;
Restore a mobility space for the watercourse downstream of the marsh upstream of the hamlet of Sollier.
| Authority type | Authority name | Authority role | Authority responsibility |
|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Communauté de communes des sources du lac d’Annecy (CCSLA) (federation of municipalities of Annecy lake sources) | Initiation of the measure | Responsible |
| Architects / Engineers | HYDRETUDES | Implementation | Supporting |
| Other | Conservatoire des espaces naturels (CEN) de Haute Savoie | Monitoring | Supporting |
| Regional / sub-national water authority | Water Agency Rhône Méditerranée Corse | Financing | Supporting |
| Regional / sub-national water authority | Haute Savoie Departement | Financing | Supporting |
Site Information
Low (0-5 %) downstream of Faverges
Design and Implementation
Financing
Phase 2 (Reconnection of the Giez marsh) : € 147,931.00
Phase 3 (Restoration of ecological continuity in the town of Faverges) : € 1,881,313.40
Phase 4 (Restoration of a mobility space downstream of the marsh) : € 99,547.20
Policy and Governance
The Giez marsh is part of a complex of wetlands annexed to Annecy Lake, called the Cluse du lac d'Annecy. It is crossed by the Eau Morte, with which it is in piezometric equilibrium. It is made up of a mosaic of environments: molinia grasslands, terrestrial reed beds, alkaline low bogs, alluvial white alder forests and rivers. It has a rich biodiversity (400 plant species and 354 listed animal species), including protected species. The marsh belongs to the Natura 2000 site of the Cluse du lac d'Annecy, benefits from a biotope protection decree since 1990.
The marsh development work has led to its gradual disconnection from the watercourse that crosses it. An accumulation of ice jams at the entrance to the marsh caused an accelerated deposition of materials in the Eau Morte bed. It reached the level of the upper bank, causing overflows upstream of the marsh, and limiting sedimentary transit through it.
The Mercier plain occupies the alluvial valley of the Glière, and is covered by an alluvial forest. The watercourse is strongly incised, and is therefore disconnected from its major bed.
The village of Faverges is crossed by the Glière river. The bed of the river includes several crossing structures that cause breaks in ecological continuity and a risk of flooding during 100-year floods.
Flooding events
| Wider plan type | Wider plan focus | Name | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| Catchment-based | Water | Contrat de bassin | Wateshed basin contract, which includes development work to be carried out and rules to be respected in the territory |
| Activity stage | Activity type | Key issues | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| Screening phase | Dialogue weaving | Initial misunderstanding and conflicts between owners & municipality services. | Contact to all owners on the shore, discussions on river-related preoccupations. After the 2015 flood event. |
| Screening phase | Common strategy development | Integrating the preoccupations of all the stakeholders. | After 2015 and 2018 flood events, consultation with impacted inhabitants. Integration of their experience for the hydraulic model calibration. Public services and governance explaination. Action strategy construction and actions proposal. |
Impacts and Monitoring
Monitoring System
The conservatory of natural spaces of Haute-Savoie carried out a monitoring of plant communities in the alkaline lowland sector of the Giez marsh.
In addition, monitoring according to the Rhomeo flore protocol was carried out in June 2014 and June 2019 in the Giez marsh, in order to calculate the floristic engorgement index, the floristic soil fertility index and the floristic quality index.
Piezometric monitoring
A piezometric monitoring was carried out by the conservatory of natural spaces of Haute-Savoie thanks to 4 piezometers.
A second monitoring will be set up by the federation of municipalities of Annecy lake sources, based on the 9 piezometers used in 2006 for the diagnosis of the valley, and still present on the site.
Hydraulic modelling
A hydraulic model of the marsh was developed by the project leader. It is used to assess the hydrological behaviour of the valley for a given flood.
Maintenance
Impact Assessment Methodology
Piezometric monitoring
Hydraulic modeling
Socio-economic Impacts
Biophysical impacts: Hydrology
The 2023 massive flood events did no damages to houses in the watershed, thanks to the restoration work. It highlights how much the work is successful.
Biophysical impacts: Others
Lessons Learned
The overall watershed management strategy has been a success, showing that a common construction with stakeholders can be effective.
| Driver type | Driver role | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Organisation committed to it | Main driver | A strong willingeness to explore restoration methods by the political decision makers. |
| Success factor type | Success factor role | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Attitude of the public | Main factor | The 2015 flood then proved to be a lever for the conduct of the territorial dialogue and the involvement of local residents in the project. Today, the transversal approach between elected officials facilitates the implementation of flood prevention within a framework of upstream-downstream solidarity. |
It is already being mimicked in a neighboor watershed.