Ecological Restoration of Mata Radeanu, Romania

Year of issue
2025
Summary

The project’s objective was to improve the conservation status of aquatic bird species in Lower Prut Floodplain Natural Park (Galați County, RO) through scientific inventory, monitoring, site restoration, awareness-raising, implementation of the park management plan, and the designation of Natura 2000 SPAs. Partners were the University of Bucharest, the Romanian Ornithological Society and Romsilva – Galați Forestry.

At Mața-Rădeanu, dykes were rebuilt to restore hydraulic control: a 1,800 m dyke separating Mața (Galați) from Cârja (Vaslui) and a 3,600 m dyke subdividing Mața; a birdwatching tower serves the complex. The area falls in SPA ROSPA0130 Mața-Cârja-Rădeanu and functions today as a large fish-farming/recreational fishing complex managed locally by AJVPS Galați; recent county risk documentation lists “Amenajarea Piscicolă Mața-Rădeanu.” In 2024, local press reported drought-related low water affecting this complex.

Photo Gallery
Location
46.090833, 28.097778
Project
NWRM
National ID
Romania_ 06
Sector
Hydromorphology
Installation Date
2009
Implementation status
Completed
Contact
Bogdan Barbu, RECImola Koszta

Overview

Location of the project
Within the Mața–Rădeanu fish-farming complex along the Prut dyke on the Galați–Vaslui border.
Country
Romania
NUTS2 Code
Sud-Est
Sponge measures implemented in the case study
Floodplain restoration and management
Lake restoration
Objectives
Improve the conservation status of 13 priority and 50+ other Birds Directive species present in the Lower Prut Floodplain Natural Park.
Re-establish the ecological balance of lakes by fixing degraded hydrological structures and improving/maintaining water levels.
Designate four SPAs (Romanian Natura 2000) and prepare/approve an integrated park management plan and administration.
Carry out inventories and monitoring, plus public engagement (village consultations, picture books, nature trails, six annual environment days, bird-watching towers).
Rehabilitate dykes to manage water levels: 1,800 m boundary dyke (Mața–Cârja) and 3,600 m internal dyke subdividing Mața.
Involved partners
Authority type Authority name Authority role
Regional / sub-national water authority Regional Environmental Protection Agency Galati Monitoring
Other County Council Galati Initiation of the measure
Other University of Bucharest, Research Center for Environment and Impact Studies Determination of design details of the measure
NGO Romanian Ornithological Society Monitoring
Other Forestry Department Galati Determination of design details of the measure
Other Park Administration Lower Prut Floodplain Determination of design details of the measure

Site Information

Climate Zone
Warm temperate dry
Precipitation
500.00 mm
Temperature (°C)
11.00 °C
Elevation range
8
Groundwater level
~9–32 m depth; flow toward the Lower Prut floodplain
Vegetation class
Aquatic & palustrine vegetation.
WFD Ecological status
Good
WFD Chemical status
Good
Water quality status
Organic loading and high mineralization; risks from agricultural pesticides and transboundary accidental discharges

Design and Implementation

Project scale
Micro
Project scale specifications
Site-level hydromorphology within a meso-scale park project.
Area subject to Land use change or Management/Practice change (ha)
605.40 ha
Favourable preconditions
Wetlands belong to the category of ecologically fragile areas, their dynamic being influenced mainly by the qualitative and quantitative characteristic of the water in the hydrographical basin in which they extend. For this reason, the conservation measures promoted in these spaces must be doubled by a strict control of the anthropic activities / arrangements using water for different purposes or as a medium of discharging some wastes.

Financing

Total cost
824710.00 €
Financing authorities
Authority name Type of funding Comments Financing share
European Union EU-funds: LIFE+ 412,355 € 50 %
The Ministry of Environment and the Sustainable Development National funds 412,355 € with all non-EU sources 50 %
Galati County Council Local funds 412,355 € with all non-EU sources 50 %
Compensations
No

Policy and Governance

Policy description
To deal with the degradation of hydrological structures, the project also aims to re-establish the ecological balance of the lakes, including improvement of the water level and its maintenance. The rehabilitation works are aimed at the maintaining of the water level of the Mata Lake for the protection of the existing habitats, an area making integral part of special conservation area in the Lower Prut Floodplain Natural Park, both during drought periods and the flooding ones.
Land ownership
State public domain (fish-farm area); operated by AJVPS Galați.
Policy targets
Increase Water Storage
Improved Biodiversity
Groundwater Recharge
Part of a wider plan
Yes
Wider plan
Wider plan type Wider plan focus Name
National Environment & Biodiversity Lower Danube Green Corridor programme
Public consultation
Yes
Consultation activities
Activity stage Activity type Key issues
Implementation phase Awareness raising activities These include information dissemination, consultation of every village in the area, and active participation and education with local educational material to be produced. The project takes into account that there is a relatively high illiteracy in the area and will address stakeholders in wide variety of ways, including picture books, nature trails, six annual environment days with expeditions into the area, children's exhibitions, and bird watching towers
Has contractual arrangements
No

Impacts and Monitoring

Monitoring System

Monitoring requirements
The management plan puts ongoing monitoring with the park administration, while the Mața–Rădeanu case lists Regional Environmental Protection Agency Galați and SOR specifically as monitoring actors.
Monitoring parameters
As in the project framework, the site tracks bird population status and organochlorine pesticide bioaccumulation in birds, alongside water quality and quantity.

Maintenance

Maintenance requirements
The restored dykes are maintained (filling/compacting gaps) to manage water levels across the 1,800 m boundary dyke and the 3,600 m subdividing dyke; the complex also has a birdwatch tower.

Socio-economic Impacts

Direct benefits information
Better conditions for the birds population; increasing the number for aquatic bird species (especially those listed in Annex I of Birds Directive, Bern Convention and in ORNIS lists); improve the trophic state and saprobity of the target aquatic systems; allowing the water oxygenation of the lakes through the input of the fresh water from the Prut River; including the monitoring birds protocols in the adaptive Management Plan of Lower Prut Floodplain Natural Park;
Active fish-farming/recreational fishing platform (~607 ha, AJVPS), with generic tourism/recreation benefits from the restoration.
Ancillary benefits information
Supply the potential of fisheries resources; using the potential of providing services for tourism and recreation;

Biophysical impacts: Hydrology

Hydrological effects
Increased water storage and maintained levels

Biophysical impacts: Biodiversity

Improved biodiversity
Yes
Information on improved biodiversity
Restoration of aquatic birds sites in the natural protected area located in Lower Prut Floodplain Natural Park - Mata Lake

Biophysical impacts: Water & Soil Quality

Water quality overall improvements
Positive impact-WQ improvement
Information on water quality overall
Improved trophic state and saprobity and oxygenation of the lakes by fresh Prut inflows

Lessons Learned

Key lessons
Rehabilitating key dykes (1,800 m boundary; 3,600 m internal) restored hydraulic control and helped keep water levels within a range that protects habitats during both low-water and flood periods; restoration here also contributes to broadening habitat networks relevant to Natura 2000.
Barriers
Barrier type Barrier role Comments
Lacking financing sources Main barrier Park-level under-funded maintenance and siltation, reducing fish-farming usability by ~70% (a long-term operational constraint for hydraulic assets in the complex).
Other Secondary barrier Degradation of hydrological structures (reason for the dyke works).
Other Secondary barrier Physical gaps in dykes requiring filling/compaction during 2009 works.
Success factors
Success factor type Success factor role Comments
Attitude of decision makers Main factor Clear technical leadership/roles (County Council initiation; design inputs from Park Admin, Forestry Dept., University; monitoring by REPA Galați and SOR).
Financing possibilities Main factor Financing mix: EU LIFE+, national, county.
Communication activities Secondary factor Park-wide communication and education measures that supported uptake.
Transferability
Highly transferable to low-gradient river–floodplain lakes: modest channel dredging plus small sluices and dyke repairs can restore levels and habitat. Success hinges on sediment load and long-term maintenance, available inflows, protected-area rules and stakeholder alignment. Watch for rapid re-siltation, drought-driven low flows and fish-farm constraints; embed monitoring of birds and water quality.

Sources